SBI Fungicides
Membership

The Working Group is comprised of the following members:

Dr. Klaus Stenzel (Chairman) Bayer CropScience, Monheim , Germany
Dr. Robert Bird

DuPont de Nemours, Nambsheim, France

Mr. Renato Castagna

Makhteshim-Agan, Brussels, Belgium

Mr. Jean-Luc Genet

DuPont de Nemours ( France) SA, Nambsheim, France

Dr. Friedrich Kerz-Moehlendick

Bayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany

Dr. Greg Kemmitt

Dow AgroSciences, Abingdon, UK

Mr. Andy Leadbeater

Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland

Dr. A. Mehl

Bayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany

Mr. Christoph Neumann

Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland

Dr. Osvaldo Puppin

Isagro, Mailand, Italy

Dr. M. Semar

BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany

Dr. H. Sierotzki

Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland

Dr. G. Stammler

BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany

 
Introduction and General Information about Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors (SBI's)

The FRAC-SBI (formerly DMI) working group was set up in 1982. The group meets annually to review monitoring data and to agree recommendations for the use of SBI fungicides.

Definitions - SBI-Fungicides

There are four classes of fungicides that comprise the Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitor's (abbreviated SBI's): Only three classes (G1 to G3) are used as agricultural fungicides: DMI-fungicides, Amines (before called “Morpholine”- fungicides) and Hydroxyanilides. All classes inhibit targets within fungal sterol biosynthesis but differ in regard to the precise target sites they inhibit.

The SBI based fungicides represent an important class of agricultural fungicides. They make a major contribution to world agricultural production

Overview on Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors

Class I: DMI-Fungicides

SBI-fungicides that inhibit the C14 demethylation step within fungal sterol biosynthesis are now commonly characterised as DeMethylation-Inhibitors (Abbreviation: DMI's).
Chemically, DMI's belong to different classes. Beside triazoles, numerous imidazoles, pyridines and pyrimidine all have been shown to act as demethylation inhibitors.
Typically, DMI's have a broad spectrum of activity against a range of economically important pathogens on arable crops, top fruit, vines, plantation crops, etc.

Class II: Amines

Like the DMI's the Amines also belong to different chemical classes. The first representatives of this group were chemically morpholines. Although representatives of two other chemical groups (piperidines and spiroketalamines) have entered the market, the group designation < Morpholines> is partly still used for all three chemical classes. Amines inhibit to a variable degree two target sites within the sterol biosynthetic pathway, the ? 8 ? ? 7 isomerase and the ? 14 reductase.

Amines have a narrower spectrum of activity than the DMI's. They can be used alone but are often used in mixtures with DMI's to control powdery mildews and rusts.

Class III: Hydroxyanilide - Fungicides

Currently this class is represented by fenhexamid. Hydroxyanilides inhibit the C3-keto-reductase step in ergosterol biosynthesis. Hydroxyanilides have a narrower spectrum of activity than the DMI's and Amines – fenhexamid is a specific botryticide, which does not show cross-resistance to other classes of anti-Botrytis fungicides.

Resistance to fungicides

Resistance to fungicides is a normal phenomenon embodied in the natural process of the evolution of biological systems. By close co-operation within the agrochemical industry and collaboration with researchers, advisors and with growers we can ensure that fungicides are used optimally and continue to offer the benefits they currently confer.

Resistance to SBI fungicides

Resistance to SBI fungicides has been well characterized during the last 20 years. Problems with SBI performance typically became obvious only after several years of intensive use with efficacy degrading stepwise. Following reduced selection pressure, a partial recovery in sensitivity is often observed.
The mechanism of resistance is mostly controlled by the accumulation of several independent mutations and is generally referred to as “continuous selection”, “quantitative resistance” or “shifting”.


General scheme of a shifting type resistance


Resistance Type is designated as “continuous selection” or “shifting”.

This is based on the observation that resistance to DMIs or Amines is mostly characterized by a slow, stepwise erosion of efficacy over several years of intensive use rather than by a rapid loss of control.

Genetic Basis of Resistance:

Accumulation of several mutations is needed to lower the sensitivity of pathogens to DMIs or Amines ( à polygenic resistance).

Resistance risk is generally considered to be

•  low to medium (amines) or
•  medium (DMIs)

Resistance development is typically correlated with a fitness penalty for less sensitive isolates. Partial back-shift possible if selection pressure decreases.


Cross Resistance among SBI - fungicides

Whilst there is positive cross-resistance amongst the DMIs and amongst the Amines, there is no cross-resistance between the DMIs, Amines and Hydroxyanilides
 
Monitor Methods

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE USE OF SBI FUNGICIDES


The SBI fungicides represent one of the most potent classes of fungicides available to the grower for the control of many economically important pathogens. It is in the best interest of all those involved in recommending and using these fungicides that they are utilised in such a way that their effectiveness is maintained.

The summaries and recommendations included in this report are based upon data generated by members of the FRAC-SBI Working Group and upon the work of non-industry collaborators. The working group concentrates its resources on the major crop/pathogen targets from the point of view of resistance risk. Inevitably many, still important, pathogens are omitted. To help in making recommendations for crops and pathogens not directly covered above, the following general recommendations can be made:

Repeated application of SBI fungicides alone should not be used on the same crop in one season against a high-risk pathogen in areas of high disease pressure for that particular pathogen.

For crop/pathogen situations where repeated spray applications (e.g. orchard crops/powdery mildew) are made during the season, alternation (block sprays or in sequence) or mixtures with an effective non cross-resistant fungicide are recommended (see FRAC fungicide group list on the FRAC website).

Where alternation or the use of mixtures is not feasible because of lack of effective or compatible non cross-resistant partner fungicides, then input of SBI's should be reserved for critical parts of the season or crop growth stage.

If DMI or amine fungicides performance should decline and sensitivity testing has confirmed the presence of less sensitive forms, SBI's should only be used in mixture or alternation with effective non cross-resistant partner fungicides.

The introduction of new classes of chemistry offers opportunities for more effective resistance management. The use of different modes of action should be maximised for the most effective resistance management strategies.

Users must adhere to the manufacturers' recommendations. In many cases, reports of “resistance" have, on investigation, been attributed to cutting recommended rates of use, or to poor or miss-timed application.

Fungicide input is only one aspect of crop management. Fungicide use does not replace the need for resistant crop varieties, good agronomic practice, plant hygiene/sanitation, etc.


 
Contact



Dr. Klaus Stenzel
Chairman

Bayer CropScience AG
Alfred-Nobel-Str. 50, Building 6240
D-40789 Monheim
Tel: +49-2173-383652
Fax: +49-2173-384869

Email: Dr. Klaus Stenzel

Site

Disclaimer
Impressum
SBI Archive
SBI Members Only

Copyright FRAC 2005